I know everyone's dying to know the secret. Well, I'm sorry to say, there is none. I've been incredibly lucky over the past few days and I caught just enough cards to get by. I think I played pretty good poker, but the cards certainly helped. If you'd like to know the strategy of this particular hack, here are my 10 rules for cashing in a MTT.
1. Play premium hands strong, get paid off.
2. Lay down hands when you're pretty sure you're beat.
3. Don't slow play unless you're positive that next card won't hurt you.
4. Avoid dumb plays (Fancy Play Syndrome is generally wrong).
5. Suckout at least once.
6. Survive a suckout at least once.
7. Win a couple coin flips.
8. Avoid big stacks late.
9. Avoid desperate stacks late unless you have a strong idea you can bust them.
10. Get lucky.
I don't think I'm breaking any new ground here. Tonight I played in four MTT's and didn't cash in any. And I busted out of all of them in similar fashion. One time, I decided to believe a player didn't have a Q with two on the board. I had plenty of chips to work with at that point. Another, I miraculously tripled up late with AA and then donked everything away a few hands later when I get married to A9s and called a raise for all my chips. I called a raise with A9s. Naturally, he turned over AKs and flushed. I had plenty of chips to wait for a better spot, but didn't
I played anxious and impatient tonight, and it cost me. I think a losing night after some remarkable days helps bring into focus what I was doing right.
Tournaments are about the long term (in a short term sense). It's about folding a lot and selective aggression. I think I read that somewhere. You have to get paid off on your big hands. You have to steal a few pots when your premium hands miss the pot. You have to steal a few blinds.
Oh, and another thing, table image doesn't matter. Really, 99% of the players in the tournaments are spending absolutely no time thinking about how I played that big hand last time. They probably don't know that I generally raise between 3 and 4.5 times the big blind. They don't know because they aren't worried about my table image. The tournament moves quickly and players are bounced around enough that table image is highly overrated in online tournaments.
Addendum: Sometimes you just lose. You don't play bad. You just lose. Sometimes, KK runs into AA. Sometimes AA runs into KK and a K on the flop. Sometimes your flush gets rivered by a boat. Sometimes your boat gets rivered by quads. Unless you decided to never get into a pot against a stack bigger than yours, these things are going to happen. That's just the way it is.
So, take it for what it's worth. This is just the poker blogosphere's resident luckbox speaking. Thoughts from a professional sucker outer. Of course, until you can master that, you should probably ignore the rest of my advice.
Coming soon: CJ's Guide to Sucking Out.
I like the nickname, though it's not exactly appropriate. Your resume speaks for itself. Very good list and the impatience part is a HUGE deal. Gotta keep it together for an extended period of time to do well in MTTs and that is nearly always the reason for poor play by me.
I am very much looking forward to the next installment, as I am one of the worst players I know at sucking out.
Posted by: Joe Speaker at November 22, 2005 11:55 PMMy rule #1, "Take the Pot Now", is pretty similar to your rule #4.
TTPN... I'm going to start selling bumper stickers.
Posted by: Alan at November 23, 2005 12:10 AMI do know by typing "I'm going to suckout here" in the chat box increases your chances of nailing that 4-outer by 27.27%.
Do you see why?
Posted by: Drizztdj at November 23, 2005 8:47 AMAnxiously awaiting the Guide to Sucking out.
Posted by: Rav at November 23, 2005 8:52 AMCJ is the master at calling his own suckouts, as I've been personally busted by him.
My question is, "How does he do it?". I'm looking forward to the next installment.
K4? I'm still smarting over that one.
Posted by: Easycure at November 23, 2005 9:27 AMOf course, CJs win streak either proves or disproves the idea that poker is really a game of skill and not luck.
If we believe CJ's assertion that he's really JUST lucky, then all poker is gambling just like the lottery.
I prefer to believe that CJ is an excellent tourney player.
Posted by: G-Rob at November 23, 2005 9:50 AMI concur with G-Rob. CJ is good. Luck is nice but you need to be good.
Excellent stuff here. My last big money win was only after getting lucky with pocket 10s vs pocket rockets.
Table image online is pretty much non-existent though you do know when the push monkeys are going to get extra stupid. I think if you do take a little time to pay attention to what certain players are doing at your table, it will pay off.
The addendum hits home too. Tough when you are just going to lose no matter what.
Posted by: StB at November 23, 2005 10:53 AMVery nice post CJ.
I wanted to say that I enjoyed playing with you in Pauly's tourney on Saturday. Looking forward to this weekend also.
Congrats on the great run and I agree with you completely, patience is a huge key.
GaryC
Posted by: GaryC at November 23, 2005 11:22 AMI hate tournaments. Ring games are so much more profitable, especially the $30/60 games.
Aloha,
Jeff
Posted by: jeff at November 23, 2005 11:40 AMWell, Jeff, if you can find a $30/$60 game you can beat and have the bankroll to play it, I would imagine it's a lot more profitable than my little tournaments.
But then again, why not play $100/$200? Wouldn't that be more profitable?
Posted by: CJ at November 23, 2005 1:32 PM