PLAYERS:

Luckbox | Otis | G-Rob

About the Up For Poker Blog

Contact: pagemaster -@- upforanything.net

Featured
Sponsor:

Play Online Poker
Use Referral Code: UPFOR600

Nat Arem's Poker Blog

Up For Poker: The Nuts archive
Online Poker
Bonuses:


PokerStars still accepts U.S. players

Use "First2008" bonus code for first-time desposit bonus!

Play Online Poker
Play Online Poker
100% Deposit Bonus
Poker Resources

Poker News, Strategy, Resources
Poker Pro Blogs
Free PokerStars Avatars and Player Images
Poker hand nicknames

Poker Blogs:

wpbtchip.bmp
Up For Poker Blog Categories:

2006 WSOP
2007 World Series of Poker
2008 Belmont Stakes
2008 Kentucky Derby
2008 World Series of Poker
B&M Poker
Bad Beats
Betting the Ponies
Bradoween
Craps
Fantasy Sports
G-Rob's Thoughts
Home Games
Horse Racing
Internet Gambling Bill
Las Vegas
Lefty's Thoughts
Luckbox's Thoughts
NETeller News
Online Poker
Other Gambling
Otis' Thoughts
Pick 6
Playing For Fun
Playing For Money
PLO
Poker Blogger Tournaments
Poker Blogs
Poker in the News
Poker Law and Legal News
Poker Movies
Poker on TV
Poker Players
Poker Psychology
Poker Theory
Poker Web Sites
Pot Limit Omaha Strategy
Reading Material
The Nuts
The Playboy Mansion
Tournament Action
Tuff Fish Appreciation Society
Tunica Tales
UIGEA
Underground Games
Up for Poker News
WPBT Holiday Classic Trip


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.


Play Poker Online at Full Tilt Poker

July 9, 2004

The Cincinnati Kid

by Otis

The multi-table tournament had just started. The $200 Pot Limit game was going very well. I'd flopped a set on my first hand. The Hilton Sisters held up on the second hand. The fourth hand was big slick. I made the ace on the flop and forced an angry BB to lay down his cowboys. He kept vowing, "I'm coming to get you, Otis." That surely boded well for me. I was already up nearly two hundred dollars.

But DirecTV was nudging my noodle every couple of seconds. It's coming on! The Cincinnat Kid is coming on!

If only I had TiVo.

I thought for a couple of seconds and decided I would swallow my pride and do it the old fashioned way.

I grabbed an old VHS tape, popped it in the bedroom VCR, and went back to my game.

A few hours later, I finished my game $250 up (the cards ran a little cold after the initial lightening ride). I busted out in 9th (that's the third time I've done that) in the multi.

Although it was starting to get a little late, I decided that perhaps Steve McQueen might be able to offer me something in the way of guidance.

I'll admit from the outset that I'd never seen The Cincinnati Kid. While I like old movies from time to time, I've never been a big fan of films produced in the 60s. More than anything, the films' scores almost always give me the redass.

Nevertheless, I had to see THE poker movie. How could I converse intelligently with my poker brethren without a good base of knowledge on the McQueen flick?

As the film started and McQueen, heretofore known as The Kid, started his mad dash through the train yard, I thought to myself, "They should really re-make this movie and update it for people of my generation."

Thirty minutes in, I realized, "Oh, yeah. They did re-make this movie. It's called Rounders."

For those who have not taken the time to see the film, here's a brief synopsis (my apologies to the readers who know every line of the film by heart). Warning: If you've not see The Cincinnati Kid and plan to, there are more than a few spoliers in here. You've been warned.

The Cincinnati Kid is rolling tough, switch-blade games in the roughest parts of New Orleans. He's looking to make his bones. He wants to be The Man. Thing is, he's not. Lancey Howard (Edward G. Robinson) is. At the same time, The Kid is fighting to maintain a relationship with his girl, Christian (Tuesday Weld), and fighting off the advances of his father figure's wife, Melba (Ann Margret). That father figure, Shooter (Karl Malden), is fighting a massive debt and his inability to repay it without giving up what he values most, his honesty and integrity. The movie culminates in a marathon game of five-card stud in a New Orleans hotel suite.

At the risk of pointing out the obvious and perhaps repeating what other reviewers have, let's review the obvious comparisons.

The Kid=Mike McD

They are both young, experienced players who are bent on making their bones in the poker world. The money doesn't matter as much as being the best. Integrity and fair play are important to both players.

What I find funny is what the 1965 poker eyes saw as a Kid. I don't know how old McQueen was supposed to be in the movie, but in reality his was 34. Mike McD was a law student. Today, early-20s kids are playing on the net and busting the pros at the WSOP. However, some of those kids of today are like Chris Vogl, the engligh brat who won Event #1 of the WSOP this year and proudly proclaimed to the ESPN cameras that he didn't care about the glory. He only wanted to money. That's another post for another day, but let me be the first to say that Vogl is an oaf. Keep playing for the money, kid.

Shooter=Worm

If you're like me and watched The Cincinnati Kid after you watched Rounders, you might think at first that Karl Malden is the Rounders equivalent to Mike McD's law professor. Turns out, Shooter is Worm almost through and through. He's in debt up to his ears. The only way he can dig out is to cheat. His cheating ends up putting The Kid in jeopardy. Sound familiar?

Lancey Howard=?

It's actually not as much of a question mark as I make it out to be. Howard is a combination of Teddy KGB and the WSOP. In Rounders, McD has to make it through KGB to make his run to Vegas. In The Cincinnati Kid, Lancey Howard is the both brass rings wrapped up in one.

William Slade=Gramma

Both are the guys who are turning the screws on the protagonists' best buddy. Both are vicious and unrelenting.

******

While not exactly the same, the plot points are similar. The Kid's girl doesn't understand his poker and only wants him for love. Melba (a painfully sexy Ann Margret) just wants a piece of the Kid's ass because of who he is. The Kid has to fight to keep the game honest because he wants to win for real.

Upon a little reflection, here's the official analysis of The Cincinnati Kid vs. Rounders:

The Cincinnati Kid is Rounders if Rounders stopped when McD lost his roll to KGB. Simple as that.

Or...

Rounders is The Cincinatti Kid, plus the tale of what happens to the Kid after he collects his thoughts and gets back in the game.

****

Here's an interesting tidbit about 1960s America vs. 2000 America.

The Kid loses the game, but gets the girl.

Mike McD wins the game but loses the girl.

Both are Hollywood endings, but for different generations. They both follow the same theme of "we must sacrifice to succeed," but the movies differ in what success actually is. I think that is an interesting window into a forty-year gap in America's thoughts on success and love.

Speaking of girls, and forgive me for saying so, but give me Tuesday Weld and Ann Marget any day over the supermodels of 2004. Most of today's actresses don't hold a candle to Ann Margret's hyper-aggressive sexual come-ons and Tuesday Weld's girlish innocence. And the bodies on those women...

Sorry, my wife is pregnant. I've been a bit, uh...lonely recently.

****

So, that's the dimestore analysis after only a night of sleep and three Diet Mountain Dews. I'm sure many more parallels can be drawn. Those are simply the ones that come to mind first.

I wonder what the next great poker movie will be?

| Poker Movies
Comments

I'm not going to read your post. I need to see this movie and I can't rent it at the local Blockbuster (no copy of it). I'll track down somehow... or feel free to mail me your copy!

Posted by: CJ at July 9, 2004 12:45 PM

You have way too much time on your hands, Otis. LOL :)

Posted by: Felicia at July 9, 2004 9:01 PM

Well done.

Posted by: Pauly at July 9, 2004 9:51 PM

Amazon has it on VHS. I'm holding out for the DVD; I check every month or two to see if it's available yet. I keep getting disappointed.

Posted by: LordGeznikor at July 10, 2004 6:20 AM

You say that the Kid loses the game and gets the girl, while Mike McD wins the game and loses the girl.

If you review the end of Rounders, you will see that it is strongly implied that Mike actually gets the girl back (in the fictional time after the movie ends).

I was always a little disappointed with that Hollywood-ism because it ripped away a lot of the meaning of his development as a character. He screwed up at first and lost all the money, then screwed up again by breaking his promise, and screwed up by getting involved cheating. But somehow, he made it all better.

No.

It should have been that after all the screwups Mike made, he had to pay the price - either the girl or the game. But that ending implies that ultimately he paid no price.

Posted by: EG at July 11, 2004 6:50 PM

He only got (a shot at) the girl (again) because he's Matt Damon. If that was me... that girl would never talk to me again.

Posted by: Pauly at July 12, 2004 1:43 PM

But are there Oreo Cookies in The Cincinnati Kid?
I DON'T THINK SO!

Posted by: at July 12, 2004 9:37 PM
Poker Blog Main Page

Up For Poker Blog RSS

Up For Poker RSS Feed

Sponsors:

Poker Source Online Sign up for online poker via PSO and get free poker gifts! Pick from 12 rooms like Party Poker.


Sign up on Rakeback.org for the best rakeback including the highest Full Tilt Rakeback at 27%. If you prefer bonuses try PokerStars bonus code or Titan Poker bonus code instead.

Poker Forums

PokerHelper.com offers poker articles, poker bonus codes, poker news and a poker forum. Other popular pages: US poker sites, full tilt referral code and titan poker codes.


If you are interested in purchasing advertising on Up For Poker, limited space is still available. Please click here to contact the webmaster or send an email to: advertising@upforpoker.com.

Previous Hands:

August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003

Powered by:
Movable Type 4.1