ESPN has been in the game for years. The poker movie, Rounders, features Matt Damon watching the classic World Series of Poker showdown between Johnny Chan and Eric Seidel.
Despite years of experience, however, ESPN has become the short stack at the table thanks to the Travel Channel and its hugely popular World Poker Tour.
Now... even more players are coming to the table, hoping to win big.
We'll start at the beginning with the granddaddy of poker, the World Series of Poker at Binion's Horseshow casino. ESPN has shown the final table for more than a decade. It was packaged into a single show, and it drew a small audience.
Then came the World Poker Tour on the Travel Channel. It was our first chance to see the hole cards as the game was played. It revolutionized the way we watched poker on TV, and America responded. It quickly became the highest rated show in the small cable network's history.
ESPN quickly responded, giving us the most-highly produced WSOP event ever. We saw the tournament from beginning to end. We saw hole cards at the feature table. We learned about the players away from the table. We met the masters and the dead money. And we watched an online amateur win it all.
The rest of the television world is taking notice. Starting December 2nd, Bravo will air Celebrity Poker Showdown. The lineup for game 1 is Ben Affleck, Don Cheadle, Willie Garson (gay friend on Sex in the City), Emily Proctor (hot blonde on CSI: Miami), and David Schwimmer. My money is on Don Cheadle... he was in Ocean's Eleven so I think that makes him the favorite.
On December 9th, you'll see Timothy Busfield, Allison Janney, Richard Schiff, Martin Sheen, and John Spencer, all from NBC's West Wing. Bravo and NBC are television partners (maybe GE owns both, I'm not sure). I predict this series will be a huge success.
NBC is certainly taking note, and will gamble on a poker special of its own. Air date? Try Super Bowl Sunday! The peacock network believes the non-Super Bowl watchers might stop by for a little poker action. I'll have to set my VCR... I'll be watching the big game. (UPDATE: Commenter Liquid Swords is right, the special will air from 4pm-6pm before the start of the big game. Now I can watch both.)
The Game Show Network doesn't have poker, but it will have its own world series of cards. The World Series of Blackjack. As a blackjack fan myself, I'll certainly give this a try. However, I suspect it will lack the drama of the WSOP because blackjack doesn't have the same player-to-player interaction.
Soon, there will be a cable network for gambling. The Casino and Gaming Television Network will offer a show of poker advice, tours of casinos and more. Its biggest roadblock will be finding advertisers. Family groups have already begun their campaigns against the network.
In the end, the big winner will be you and me, the poker players. I say the more poker on TV the better. It's helped lead to an explosion of poker online, and the more players, the more fish. And I'm sure we can all agree that's a good thing.
Well written. But I thought that NBC was airing the WPT before the Superbowl was scheduled to start. I could be wrong, but either way, it's poker on national TV, which is great no matter how you slice it.
LS
Posted by: Liquid Swords at November 24, 2003 5:45 PMFox Sports has started airing a few items such as yesterday's "Poker Million World Chamionships" from the Isle of Man, and "Showdown at the Sands Atlantic City Poker Tournament" coming up from 2:30 to 6:30 on the 27th.
Posted by: James at November 24, 2003 5:55 PMI wanted to get on that Bravo show so bad, and I totally didn't qualify as a big enough celebrity. That was the suck.
Anyway, I totally agree that the WSOP is the best it's ever been, and more networks competing for viewers means better coverage of more events, which is great for us all.
I wonder, though, do you think shows like WPT hurt any of the pros? I can't imagine that they'd pass up an opportunity to study each tournament they played in, and look for tells and patterns in their opponents, especially since they know their hole cards. Has anyone written an article about that? I bet it'd be pretty interesting.
Posted by: wil at November 25, 2003 12:47 AMGood idea for an article. I'd also be interested in hearing about the impact of the WPT and WSOP on the pro players. I guess it would depend on which hands they broadcast. If they show you bluffing a lot, then you'll probably get called down when you have the goods more often. If they always show you with good hands, you can bluff more. You would just need to adjust you game according to what was broadcast. Of course, I'm just guessing, I could be completely off base, here.
Posted by: LS at November 25, 2003 9:35 AMYou know Wil, I thought the same thing some time back. If I were a pro I'd get my hands on every televised game with the hole card cam. What a gold mine for the astute pro to be able to see their opponents hole cards and study their reactions and their play. I think it will definitely require them to adapt their game.
Oh and btw, maybe you should lobby your way onto the Bravo thing on the strength of your skillz rather than your celebrity. IMO, it's a lot more fun to watch a truly skilled player, than some celebrity hack. If I want to watch someone chase a gutshot straight to the river, I can just go online. If you ever play on UB look for me sometime. I'm "TheRandall".
Phil Hellmuth plays on UB regularly, and I stopped by his table once to ask him about his hole cards being shown. I'll also do a little research and get that article up in short order.
After all... if wil requests it, who am I to turn that down? :-)
Posted by: CJ at November 25, 2003 10:33 PMMy money is on Afflek - he plays a lot of big money games and while it sounds like he takes a bath in those it is experience that should pay off here.
Posted by: john at November 29, 2003 2:28 PMWell... Ben made it to heads up, but lost to the gay friend from Sex in the City. Can he ever face Matt Damon again?
Posted by: CJ at December 3, 2003 3:13 AM