Play pool table poker with us, and you're bound to hear the host exclaim, "F$@# the river!!!" He tends to believe that fifth card is more unfair to him than anyone else. I've been known to suck out on him once or twice, but, as we know, that doesn't make him special.
With that in mind, we decided it might be a little more fair to him if we switched things up a bit. And with that, a new game was born:
F@#$ the River
It's very simple. It's played exactly like Texas Hold 'Em except for one very large difference: it's dealt backwards.
After two cards are dealt, the flop is one card, the turn is one card and the river is three cards. Let's just say that significantly changes the way the game is played.
I won the first hand when I flopped top pair (okay, flopped the only pair). I won the second hand when I rivered two pair (I was on, um, the two pair draw I guess since I had nothing after the turn). I was knocked out on the next hand when my opponent rivered the nut flush (I turned top pair with my J8, but there were two diamonds on the board and his AQd was a favorite... I think).
The hand of the night came when three players went all in preflop. It was ATo vs. KQ vs. JT. The flop was an Ace. The turn was a K. The river was Q-x-x. The ATo went from way ahead to out when both of his opponents caught the same card to beat him.
I think the game was a raging success, but it could use some improvements. I'm thinking maybe we should deal three cards instead of two, but only allow two cards to be used after the river. It might actually create more action on the flop or turn. It's a work in progress, but I think it's destined to be a classic. Take that, Py-nizzle!
I think I just felt the cool breeze of a fantastic idea blow through the sphere.
Posted by: Human Head at February 9, 2006 10:01 PMHow about 2 cards on the flop, 1 on the turn, and 2 on the river?
Posted by: Adam at February 9, 2006 10:29 PMOnly improvements I can think of would be to make it 8-or better hi/lo split. Pynizzle already has that, so there!
Posted by: BadBlood at February 10, 2006 7:32 AMMaybe run it twice with two shuffled decks as well (you get your two hole cards, then have two boards with two pots).
Posted by: cc at February 10, 2006 9:51 AMAnother way to change it up is to deal a hand of REGULAR hold'em, then continue to use the same deck for the Medloh hand (backward hold'em). That way, the final three cards aren't quite as random, and some of the guys that folded might actually know more about the pot odds since they had some unknown cards.
Posted by: ToddCommish at February 10, 2006 10:23 AMHey CJ, Nice running in to you in tourney tonight. It's cool to run in to a fellow blogger.
Posted by: surflexus at February 11, 2006 8:36 PMLet me know when you figure out 10-Card Hold'em.
Posted by: TeamScottSmith at February 12, 2006 1:20 PMTry dealing the last card down to each remaining player. I'm not sure if you'd want to let all 3 hole cards be playable or limit it to 2 or less.
Posted by: Magik at February 13, 2006 11:14 PMFor some reason the VictorChandler river always seems to destroy all hopes of the best hand holding up. I wish someone would do some stats analysis on it.. then we'd know for sure. Or is it just the poker gods?
Posted by: PokerBarney at February 15, 2006 9:06 AM