I think most questions are rhetorical, telling as much in the asking as we could hope from an answer. It's with that in mind that I hated the question my wife asked Friday night.
"Are you happy?", she said, as if she were asking the time.
"I think so," I replied, "I have everything a man could want."
Sometimes I wonder if that's missing the point.
THURSDAY
Of all the great G-Vegas games, and God knows there are plenty, I've always liked the bi-weekely Thursdays the best. It's a $50NL game, hosted by me or BadBlood or, most recently, Otis. The players are regular enough and all of them are good company. Many of the readers of this blog would know them by name. I've said 100 times, I play poker as much for the company as the cards, and it's especially true here.
But last Thursday, I was bored.
I managed to double, almost triple, up in the first 90 minutes before losing interest, and my buyin, in the last few hours. Actually, I lost interest and then folded for 3 hours before finally pushing all in with the suited hammer on the last hand. Preflop.
Over time I found myself playing garbage hands just to be cute, and calling bets from people with monster hands just to see if I was reading them right. It would be arrogant to suggest that the game isn't a challenge because most of the players in it are far better than me. But I'm not sure they're taking it seriously... and that makes it less fun for me.
TUNICA REDUX
During that weekend in Tunica I played the no-max $2/$5NL game for the first time. Most of the strip casinos in Vegas have a max buyin, and I usually stick with the $200 game. It's been a good game for me on the last two trips. When I got to Tunica I was essentially looking for the same. Luckily, the Grand was only spreading the one NL flavor.
I was, without question, out of my comfort zone. I bought in for a laughable $300, when most of my table had 5-10 times as much. I played incredibly tight and passed on playable hands. But I paid VERY close attention, and once I rediscovered my style, I had a damn good time.
On Saturday, back at the lower stakes, I doubled up quickly on a very easy hand, but the level of play was poor. As the day wore on, I spent more time focused on my I-Pod's random shuffle and not enough on what my opponents were doing. In some cases the players were so easy to read, I stopped watching... out of boredom. With my style, that's a fatal mistake.
I suspect I was just as bored with poker itself at the moment, not just with this game, because of all the non-stop action the day before. But that's not something I'd be familiar with.
THE BLOG OFFICE
As always, I'm blogging from work. We have a mighty window of down time between the shows. Promoting the free exchange of ideas in a democratic society etc... etc... can be downright dull at times. It's one of the blessings of my job that I often find it easy.
Not long ago, that would've made me crazy.
At my first career stop, out in the open midwest, I used to corner every member of the staff, one or two at a time, and demand they review my work. I'd ask interns and floor waxers, reporters, photographers, and audio techs. I wanted so desparately to improve and ADVANCE, nothing else mattered.
I stayed at that job for 7 months. Then I moved to station 2.
That city was a hotbed for idiot consultants and there were several that prowled the halls at work. I'd drag them into little edit bays after the news each night to break down my story that day. Two years later, that paid off too.
Now, I'm drowning in the great ennui.
ENNUI "IN FLAMES"
As BadBlood and I drove the 9 hours to... and 9 hours from... Mississippi we talked to kill the time. Talking had the added effect of drowning out his music.
Let me take this moment to add: I enjoy the new lead singer of "In Flames" far more than the guy on their first album. This is much like saying, "I prefer copperhead bites to tarantula venom," but I threw it in for Street Cred with the Metal Heads.
American life is all ennui, at least for the vast middle class that's now playing poker and, most likely, the folks who read poker blogs. One of the challenges we face when surrounded by everything we need, is the all consuming fear that the light at the end of the tunnel is just a kerosene lantern... and a wall.
Blood says he's content. Like me, he has a great family. We both have steady jobs that feed the kids and good homes for out internet poker. We're blessed with great friends in a great part of the country. Truly, if we weigh the important things in life, both of us have it all.
So what else is there?
This is why I'm bored with poker.
THE CHALLENGE
I'm not a good player. In fact, I think we've long since established that I'm one of the worst players alive. Anyone in G-Vegas will attest to that. But, for me, poker is more than just a game. I need it as a serious outlet for my creative drive. In fact, sad as it seems, playing the game has become part of the very challenge that makes me feel alive.
This year, I want to get better. Much better and I need real help. By December I want to stop being the guy who plays poker for good times and make it a science I can really study. I've learned more than I can ever repay from my friends at Up for Poker, BadBlood, TheMark, and the bloggers (you know who you are). Now it's time to step it up.
I feel like I've hit a massive plateu in my poker play, like the initial learning curve is steep, but the work to become GOOD is well ahead. I need to get started.
Poker will never mean as much as the really IMPORTANT things, but it's always new. At least it should be. That's what makes it fun. In truth, Bad Beats are part of what make the game fun.
Bad beat stories, by the way, still suck.
THE HOLE
As for my wife's real question... I hope SHE'S happy. Happy families are, and will always be, the greatest challenge of all.
I thought, for some time really, that serious poker play was a detriment to that happy home life. Now I think the opposite is true. I shouldn't go to every poker game in town, and I shouldn't play more than 2 live games a week. But, as with those moments at home, I need to learn how to MAXIMIZE the time. The key, to real enjoyment in poker and in life, is our level of ENGAGEMENT.
When we turn inward... we're almost always depressed.
Every hand, every player, even the really horrible donkeys, have something to teach us.
This year, for the first time, I'm ready to pay attention.
As for the biweekly game: I'm ready to raise the stakes. NOW!
When my wife asked if I was happy I replied "how many credit cards [lots] do you have and what are their balances [zero]?"
"That makes me happy [reference to playing for a living".
Posted by: Rich at January 30, 2006 2:30 AMIt's nice to see someone finally recognize the contribution of RHDs (Really Horrible Donkeys) to the poker learning experience. We're just not ATMs, my friend. We are an integral part of your learning experience.
I can relate to your lack of focus. I played totally uninspired poker this weekend and have vowed not to waste my time (or anyone elses) like that again. Three things made it worth it, though: the good company of Axeman, the Bloods, and Shep; meeting a new player that Axe brought in who I will call Johnny Two Pair; and recognizing the bad habits I have picked up from on-line micro-limit play, where I can get away with playing weak-tight and still make money.
You should drop by this week, just for the change in venue. The stakes are laughable, but I still have some Guinness to get rid of, and I know you'll help a brother out.
Posted by: Otit at January 30, 2006 9:03 AMIs it the stakes or the competitiveness you want raised? Which would you rather have (put aside the obvious financial differences)?
An ultra-tough $.05/$.10 game
Or a extremely fishy $100/$200 game
Posted by: Drizztdj at January 30, 2006 9:19 AMActually Drizz, that's an EXCELLENT question.
Its exactly what I'm getting at.
In this case BOTH are good alternatives because a higher stakes game would increase MY focus and Investment....a GREAT cheap game would do the same.
I suspect the great but cheap game would wear thin over time...but the same is rue of an ultra-fishy high stakes game.
Word of warning...
I wonder if what you are longing for is more "action" and not better play. It's a fine line and it can lead to the kind of horrible beat that makes you question the game. I think many of us have been there.
There is still lots to learn in the levels at which you'll be comfortable. Don't jump up a level for the sake of the action!
That may not be what you are looking for at all, but I thought it needed to be said.
Posted by: CJ at January 30, 2006 10:20 AMIf you leave out any G-Rob vs. BadBlood hand histories, I feel very comfortable in stating the following:
G-Rob is one of the best players I've played against. My assessment of his only real weakness is his tendency to not recognize when other players have adjusted to his style.
Against a table of unknowns, if G-Rob is on his game (meaning paying attention, making reads, recognizing weaknesses) he can and will dominate a table.
However, if his concentration wanes, or if he gets bored, he can have trouble recognizing when the opposition has adjusted to his style and is ready to pounce.
Sometimes the stakes, a bad beat, or something will get him off his A-game. His style DEMANDS a higher level of concentration and it is very difficult, at least for me, to maintain that level over the course of several hours at a time. Especially considering all the distractions of a G-Vegas home game.
I'll always remember the first time I played with him at Bradoween '04. He was by far the overall chip leader in the tournament. He then got bored because he wanted to go party. He did not make the money.
Posted by: BadBlood at January 30, 2006 12:30 PMIt seems to me that jacking the stakes too high for the general population pretty much guarrantees that you end up playing against the same people every week, and that anybody not playing at your level is going to play scared, i.e. tight and boring. I'm interested: Tell me what makes a challenging game, regardless of the stakes. I'm talking players, lack of distractions, length of game, etc. I ask because I would really like to run a good and interesting game, but I can't maintain interest by bumping the stakes.
Posted by: Otit at January 30, 2006 12:52 PMI have a different technique than you to keep it interesting. I play less. When I make it to a game, I'm excited to be there. This doesn't, however, lead to stepping up your level of performance. But it does help with the boredom factor, and the wife-wondering-if-you-are-happy because you spend so much time off playing poker factor. The downside is that I'm not growing at poker as fast as my competition, which creates an even bigger Donkey-Gap in my competition than I can afford.
Posted by: TeamScottSmith at January 30, 2006 1:13 PMThere is something that bothers me about the post. You sound like you really want to play poker, that it is something more than just recreation.
However, you get bored after a while, lose your concentration, and then it goes to hell. I think the crucial question is why are you bored? CJ and Blood seem to think you are a reasonably good player, so in spite of the way you diss yourself in most of your posts, you probably are a reasonably good player.
CJ's point is very well taken. Do you get bored due to lack of action? Or is it that you just get tired of doing the same thing, reading the other guys, etc?
Maybe your most urgent need in poker training is not particularly in study on the game itself [although that should always be ongoing], but working on maintaining your focus, and increasing the span of your concentration.
Inward is not always depressing. Look inside and be truthful to yourself about what it really is you want from the game.
You don't know me from Adam, but I have been reading the Up For poker guys for a long time. I don't think you are going to BS yourself about it, and you will figure out what it is you want, and how to get there.
Posted by: FatBaldGuy at January 30, 2006 2:28 PMHey GRob,
You don't know me either, but that was a great post. Thanks for asking the question and not throwing out an answer. Well played sir.
Posted by: JohnnyHarp at January 30, 2006 4:52 PMOtis? That you in there? (tap tap)
Posted by: Uncle Ted at January 30, 2006 10:58 PMI know micro limit blogger tables may SEEM like no one cares but there's definitely some post flop play to be watching and learning from.
But you're right, it would wear thin after raking in yet another $.70 pot from a great call with bottom two pair on a flush/straight board.
Money is the ultimate scoreboard in poker.
Here's to hoping you get there G-Rob, you got the talent part down, now find the patience.
Posted by: Drizztdj at January 31, 2006 9:51 AMyes.this is my site
WWW.mindlessdimwitshill.net
[Ed. Note: This was funnier before I deleted the other mindless shill comments.]
Posted by: UFP SPAMMER at February 5, 2006 3:08 AM