PLAYERS:

Luckbox | Otis | G-Rob

About the Up For Poker Blog

Contact: pagemaster -@- upforanything.net

Featured
Sponsor:

Play Online Poker
Use Referral Code: UPFOR600

Nat Arem's Poker Blog

Up For Poker: The Nuts archive
Online Poker
Bonuses:


PokerStars still accepts U.S. players

Use "First2008" bonus code for first-time desposit bonus!

Play Online Poker
Play Online Poker
100% Deposit Bonus
Poker Resources

Poker News, Strategy, Resources
Poker Pro Blogs
Free PokerStars Avatars and Player Images
Poker hand nicknames

Poker Blogs:

wpbtchip.bmp
Up For Poker Blog Categories:

2006 WSOP
2007 World Series of Poker
2008 Belmont Stakes
2008 Kentucky Derby
2008 World Series of Poker
B&M Poker
Bad Beats
Betting the Ponies
Bradoween
Craps
Fantasy Sports
G-Rob's Thoughts
Home Games
Horse Racing
Internet Gambling Bill
Las Vegas
Lefty's Thoughts
Luckbox's Thoughts
NETeller News
Online Poker
Other Gambling
Otis' Thoughts
Pick 6
Playing For Fun
Playing For Money
PLO
Poker Blogger Tournaments
Poker Blogs
Poker in the News
Poker Law and Legal News
Poker Movies
Poker on TV
Poker Players
Poker Psychology
Poker Theory
Poker Web Sites
Pot Limit Omaha Strategy
Reading Material
The Nuts
The Playboy Mansion
Tournament Action
Tuff Fish Appreciation Society
Tunica Tales
UIGEA
Underground Games
Up for Poker News
WPBT Holiday Classic Trip


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.


Play Poker Online at Full Tilt Poker

November 8, 2005

Any Pineapple players?

by G-Rob

I badly misplayed a hand last night in a game of Crazy Pineapple 8/b. I'd like some feedback on the hand.

The game is (with 2 exceptions) an EXTREMELY LOOSE $2/$4 dealer's choice with a $200 buyin. Usually it starts with hold-em but 9 of 10 hands are a very silly NL Omaha 8b.

The big exception is Badblood who almost always calls for Crazy Pineapple.

THE HAND

I'm in the SB in the 2s at a 9-handed table. The entire table limps in until the 8s raises it to $12 and the 9s calls, the dealer folds.

I look down and find AsAd7d. Knowing the character of the table, I raise it to $50!

The 4s and the 9s both smooth call.

The flop is 6d,8s,9s which is, of course on of the most coordinated and least desireable flops I could see. With my holding I have either:

Top pair with the ace of spades.
A low draw with A-7-6-8
An OESD with the Ace of spades.

I figure the A-7 low, after the 2 preflop callers is clearly no good, and I decide I like the top pair better than the OESD.

I suspect THAT was my first mistake.

Then I decide at least one of my opponents is on that low draw, and I don't want the flush to hit so I made mistake number 2...I vastly overplayed my hand....pushing all-in for another $140.

The 4s insta-calls and so does the 9s. I know I'm beat.

The turn is a 4s meaning the low is good and so is the flush. 4s checks and the 9s bets all-in for another $200...after a good while in the tank...4s calls.

The pot is now about $1100!

4s shows 9-9 for a set of 9s.
and sure enough
9s shows Ks-Qs for the flush.

Now, at this point I consider the 9s calling for $140 on a flush draw EXTREMELY LOOSE..and the set of 9s FAIRLY LOOSE. The 4s put his opponent on the nut low and figured the call on the flush draw was unlikely.

I also, with the ace of spades, now had great outs. Any low card gives me the low. Any spade gives me the scoop.

The river is an 8c and the set catches big and scoops $1100.

I figure BOTH players were awfully loose pre-flop...but the loss was my fault after that.

THE QUESTION

At this table, I don't apologize for the $50 pre-flop raise...I figure I have a very strong starting hand and I WANT callers there. The question is in the post-flop play.

Obviously, I'm out of position here...but do I want to bet out and thus represent the low? It wouldn't have helped me here.

Given, a check is probably best on such a co-ordinated board, but with THESE players I would be pushed out by huge bets with a VERY VERY wide range of hands.

Perhaps the best suggestion on such a loose table, and usually this is how BadBlood and I play there, is just to wait for the nuts and clean up. But, I was on totally CARD DEAD TILT...which is a subject for my next post.

Any Crazy Pineapple players have some strategy to spare?

It's clearly one of my weakest games.

| Home Games
Comments

Based on my VAST Crazy Pineapple experience (okay, I have next to none), the game seems to be closer to a drawing game than a made game, sort of like Omaha. You get to see 6 cards before making your first big decision. But what do I know? I suck at Omaha, too!

Posted by: CJ at November 8, 2005 3:33 PM

1.) You can only play big pairs (or any pairs for that matter) post-flop if you've hit your set.

2.) Not knowing the players, I'd probably assume that one of them was on a low hand. But, by keeping the As7d you not ony have an OESD, and the backdoor nut draw, but you also have potential outs for the low if a 2 or 3 hits therefore counterfeiting one of your opponents' potential lows.

Also, this gives you a qualified low draw if in fact you have the situation that you had where they were both playing high.

3.) See #1 again.

Posted by: Daddy at November 8, 2005 3:45 PM

You've heard my thoughts, but I'll repeat them here. Once you had 4 players post-flop, you're effectively playing a 12-handed game. With each player getting 3 cards, that's the equivalent of 3 different hold 'em hands.

Couple that with the hi-low option, and AA loses an incredible amount of value. AA at a 10-handed table is only 30% to win when only high hands are in play.

Also, these players probably would have called an all-in pre-flop raise given what I've seen. It just seems that this game is heavily favored in post-flop decisions. And not by a little.

Posted by: BadBlood at November 8, 2005 3:46 PM

I'm confused. You're playing NL pineapple 8? Crazy.

This is not much different than a typical Omaha 8 hand. Your pre-flop raise was correct, but you missed the flop. With 2 other players, odds are someone has two undercards, making you behind on the low.

So you're left with the choice of AsAd with a running spade draw, or Ad7d with a running diamond draw. I personally would have taken the diamonds, and tried to see the turn as cheap as possible. If the price is too steep, fold.

The fatal mistake is thinking your all-in will push someone off the pot. This is an insta-call for anyone with low, plus anyone with ANY decent draw (including a set that might boat up).

I play split pot games about 80% of the time, and these two mantras run through my head: 1)Am I drawing to the nuts? 2)It's never too late to get out of a hand. I think in this case, a bet saved is a bet earned.

Posted by: Buffalo66 at November 8, 2005 10:47 PM

Always
Be
Drawing

If you play ANY split game, you'll know to chuck those aces in a heartbeat and keep the drawing hand. I suspect the same line for Pineapple 8/b.

Posted by: Drizztdj at November 9, 2005 7:55 AM

Does that mean you will be playing the Crazy Pineapple tourney they have at Ballys in December?

Posted by: StB at November 9, 2005 8:31 AM

You mean crazy pineapple has a strategy? Hmm...

Posted by: Lou at November 9, 2005 9:46 AM
Poker Blog Main Page

Up For Poker Blog RSS

Up For Poker RSS Feed

Sponsors:

Poker Source Online Sign up for online poker via PSO and get free poker gifts! Pick from 12 rooms like Party Poker.


Sign up on Rakeback.org for the best rakeback including the highest Full Tilt Rakeback at 27%. If you prefer bonuses try PokerStars bonus code or Titan Poker bonus code instead.

Poker Forums

PokerHelper.com offers poker articles, poker bonus codes, poker news and a poker forum. Other popular pages: US poker sites, full tilt referral code and titan poker codes.


If you are interested in purchasing advertising on Up For Poker, limited space is still available. Please click here to contact the webmaster or send an email to: advertising@upforpoker.com.

Previous Hands:

August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003

Powered by:
Movable Type 4.1